Back to Squawk list

787, A350, or A380: What’s The Best Plane For Passenger Experience?

ingediend
 
Have you ever watched a bottle of water become a crushed, miniature version of itself while airborne? That simple visual is the most common reminder that flying in a metal tube is not quite like life down on earth. Fortunately, airlines are investing major dough in upgrading their fleets- and some of the newer offerings are simply fantastic for the passenger experience. Here’s how to choose between the best new planes… (www.aviationfigure.com) Meer...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


joelwiley
joel wiley 4
IMHO, the 'passenger experience' is less a matter of the hollow metal tube than what the operators of the tube cram into it in the way of classes, seats and services.
wopri
Wolfgang Prigge 6
If the hollow metal tube is sized just right so you can squeeze in 9 18 inch wide seats abreast plus two aisles, but not more, than you do have at least enough width for your seats. Boeing tried to make a very confortable cabin with 2-4-2 seating in their 787, but airlines soon figured out it would be possible to use a 3-3-3 layout by fitting in narrower seats. That's why most people feel the A350 is more confortable than the B787. Before anyone protests, I fully agree that the culprits are the airlines, not Boeing.
jcsjcs
jcsjcs 1
I fully agree with both you and Wolfgang Prigge.
It feels a bit strange to read "the A380 is good because it has showers" or "a bar". No, it only has showers or a bar if you fly certain airlines in certain classes, so completely irrelevant for someone flying in coach.
And then it also depends whether the coach seats are on the main deck or the upper deck as configuration will be different. And we're not even talking about seat pitch yet.
I'm also pretty sure that humidity on the A350 will depend on how much additional water the airlines are willing to bring along...
jrchris9
john russell 2
The Question should be, which AIRLINE is the most comfortable to fly on! Aircraft manufacturers try to improve things but its ALWAYS down to the Airline.
ebychi
eby chi 2
the A380 without a doubt.
RaySouth
Ray South 1
For seat width I think the 707 took some beating!
baz192
Barrie Wallington 1
I have read Thai are due do begin using the A350, Heathrow to Bangkok route on 1st Sept, I do hope that is true, I fly that route on 18th Sept and looking forward to the experience..
cmoltay
Arda Moltay 1
I agree it is the airline in the end that defines comfort. However, I disagree with the articles mention that A380 is very quiet and stable. The upper deck does not feel very stable and the lower deck is by no means very quiet. If I had to vote I would put B787 over A380 in terms of comfort. I have not flown an A350.

Inloggen

Heeft u geen account? Nu registreren voor (gratis) op maat gemaakte kenmerken, vluchtmededelingen en nog veel meer!